Comments on: Atheism masquerading as science! (Evolution the cult religion)

By: jcgadfly

jcgadfly — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:33:13 +0000

You don’t mean Isaiah 42: 5 where God is described as stretching out the heavens? It also mentions him stretching out the earth – are you a flat earther also?

For future reference – Duane Gish runs the Institute for Creation Research and Ken Ham runs Answers in Genesis.

By: kristophershaun

kristophershaun — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:14:23 +0000

yes i actually was thinking about Isaiah 51:13, but that’s fine too

o no would i actually imply that God’s Word be taken serious on both accounts?

Yes i would serach the internet the earth is growing and used to be alot smaller, all continents used to be connected

By: jcgadfly

jcgadfly — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:21:18 +0000

As I thought – mental gymnastics for big bang cosmology and plate tectonics. Feel free to find me the foundations of the earth too, OK? Just let me know when you find the pillars.

It’s amazing what you can find when you back track through scripture and try to shoehorn things to fit your conclusions.

They made an entire religion about a guy named Jesus they called the Messiah who didn’t fulfill any Messianic prophecies.

By: kristophershaun

kristophershaun — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:00:55 +0000

the prophecies concerning the fulfillment of Yeshua are all found in Isaiah also. another person who fails to see the proof even after its put in his face. there’s no point in even talking to you

By: jcgadfly

jcgadfly — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:50:05 +0000

As I said, it’s not hard to claim Messianic prophecies are fulfilled when you have a character that you’d like to make the Messiah and package him to fit. Thank you for agreeing with my point.

Also, Jews would disagree with you on Jesus’ messiahship (you might have heard of them – they wrote the prophecies you are citing). If there were a Jesus (not sure), he’d disagree with you also.

By: kristophershaun

kristophershaun — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:48:17 +0000

if you are unsure if there was a risen Christ then you should do your own research. a good book for you would be Lee Strobel’s “The Case For The Christ” and the jews are supposed to disagree, they have their place in the future doubting the messaih according to scripture a good book for that would be Brian McCollums “Breaking The Bread of Revalation” i can’t believe people dismiss this so fast without doing research… o wait do you count zeitgeist as research? lol

By: jcgadfly

jcgadfly — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:29:22 +0000

I’ve read Strobel – good apologetics but lousy research. He didn’t look at both sides of the questions. It would be as if I told you I was writing an unbiased biography of you but only interviewed people who hated you and wanted you dead.

I’ll check my library for the other book. If I counted “Zeitgest” which I have yet to see) as research that would leave me at the level of research of Christians like NephillimFree and yourself.

A good portion of my research came from reading the Bible.

By: kristophershaun

kristophershaun — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:23:08 +0000

yes if you had read strobel you wouldn’t consider is “good apoogetics”.. keep sowing deceit to attempt to win debates, it’s funny and pathetic. something every atheists never wants to admit is that a “bible thumper” knew more than them in conversation. you say your research came from the bible excuse me while i lol at you not knowing about the big bang in it. o it’s also good to note water hasn’t always been on this planet too, and it just so happens that it was brought here.. divinely

By: kristophershaun

kristophershaun — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:30:19 +0000

just like Genesis says lol.

By: jcgadfly

jcgadfly — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:04:10 +0000

Why wouldn’t I consider Strobel’s works good apologetics? They do what they’re supposed to do which is defend the faith. My problem is that he presents his books as objective viewpoints. They’re not.

the reason I didn’t know that Big bang cosmology was in the Bible is because it’s not. You have to tweak it to make it fit. But I guess lying for your God isn’t a sin.

As for your contention that water came from god – the first chapter of Genesis stands against you. I thought you read the Bible.